Previous Issues

May 2013 

April 2013 

March 2013 

February 2013 

January 2013 

December 2012 

November 2012 

October 2012 

September 2012 

August 2012 

July 2012 

June 2012 

May 2012 

April 2012 

March 2012 

February 2012 

January 2012 

December 2011 

November 2011 

October 2011 

September 2011 

August 2011 

July 2011 

June 2011 

May 2011 

April 2011 

March 2011 

February 2011 

January 2011 

December 2010 

November 2010 

October 2010 

September 2010 

August 2010 

July 2010 

June 2010 

May 2010 

April 2010 

March 2010 

February 2010 

January 2010 

December 2009 

November 2009 

October 2009 

September 2009 

August 2009 

July 2009 

June 2009 

May 2009 

April 2009 


Previous Articles

Articles from previous editions of Property Investor News

News

UK & Ireland

International

Bookshop

Property Tax Guides available in the bookshop

Register

Register now to receive a trial issue of PIN.

 

_ARTICLES

In the July 2008 Issue of Property Investor News

Landlord Matters

The implementation of the 2004 Housing Act introduced mandatory licensing of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) for the first time, and also gave local authorities the right to introduce additional/selective licensing for other properties that were poorly managed and/or subject to antisocial behaviour.

The 2004 Housing Act also (and even more significantly) changed the definition of a "shared house" to a house in multiple occupation. The regulation of deposits was also included in the Act at a very late stage.

So, what effect has the 2004 Housing Act had on private landlords? I will take the easiest first, namely deposit regulation. This has affected all landlords that take deposits, and whether you use the custodial or insured schemes, it either costs money to register the deposits or significant time to deal with the administration in respect of the custodial scheme.

Although I personally have no time for any landlord who unlawfully withholds a deposit, I do not believe that regulating every deposit for the very small number of landlords who act unlawfully is the appropriate way to deal with the situation. It is already apparent from the very low number of disputes that such regulation was not justified, yet Government claims the scheme to be a success by the number of landlords now registering deposits. What Government has not understood is that the vast majority of landlords obey the law and would not wish to be subject to the draconian penalties imposed for not registering their deposits.

If you want to read the full article then you need to become a paid subscriber of Property Investor Newsâ„¢

 

Shopping Cart